tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3338174527262061848.post864765800705205856..comments2023-09-29T08:51:56.163-07:00Comments on Coyle's InFormation: Yee: Questions 6-8Karen Coylehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02519757456533839003noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3338174527262061848.post-86691977340248253772009-07-20T09:52:49.422-07:002009-07-20T09:52:49.422-07:00RDA already has a "bound with" relations...RDA already has a "bound with" relationship available (see http://metadataregistry.org/schemaprop/show/id/613.html for the registered relationship). "Issued with" is also there, see: http://metadataregistry.org/schemaprop/show/id/613.html. Most importantly, though, you can see how these kinds of relationships can be used to express relationships at the most appropriate level. We can't do this currently in most of our MARC-based systems (some of you with long memories might remember some extensive MARBI discussion on this many years ago).Diane Hillmannhttp://managemetadata.orgnoreply@blogger.com